Congratulations are in order for Bob Blitz of Blitz, Bardgett, & Deutsch who earned his second consecutive selection into Missouri Lawyers Media’s “The Power List” for Commercial Law attorneys.  The Power List is an exclusive group of only twenty-eight attorneys described as the “most powerful commercial and consumer attorneys in Missouri.”  Congratulations Bob!

The premise that underlies the justification for the loss of rights in arbitration is simple: both parties knowingly agreed to binding arbitration. This presumption is based upon the presumptions that 1) signators read contracts before signing, 2) they have the time and knowledge to understand the implications of the arbitration provision, and 3) they have

BB&D attorneys Robert Blitz and Aaron Sanders succeeded in defending BB&D client Kansas City-St. Louis Regional Carpenters Regional Council on appeal before the United States Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The District Court previously dismissed a Union member’s attempt to bring action against a union official for breach of statutory duties.  The appeal involved complex

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, was clearly one of the most far reaching, controversial  and consequential opinions of the 2019-20 United States Supreme Court term. The question before the United States Supreme Court in Espinoza, was whether the Free Exercise Clause precluded the Montana Supreme Court from applying Montana’s no-aid provision to

Flash Bang Policy – Should Be Reviewed

  • Flash bangs are explosive devices, which can kill a person, especially a child, if it lands directly on them.
  • “Police call them diversionary devices we call them bombs.” Law enforcement policy
  • Should  check to see if innocent individuals are around before deploying the device; that the police have

Introduction
This last year was a breakout year, with respect to  the  Missouri  sex discrimination laws.  First, the Missouri Supreme Court,  held under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA),  a plaintiff could state a  sex discrimination  claim based on sex stereotyping Second, a plaintiff could state a claim  against a school district  for failure to