The United States Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, rejected a mandate requiring employers with more than 100 employees to require their employees to vaccinate or test, holding that there was no clear congressional authority under OSHA. The Court made it clear that in order to require such a
Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association
Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association Blogs
Blog Authors
Latest from Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association
Under Title VII Employer Cannot Discriminate Against Homosexual Or Transgender Employees
In a blockbuster case, the United States Supreme Court held in Bostick v. Clayton County, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited sex discrimination when an employer intentionally fires an employee based in part on sex. The impact of this landmark case is enormous both short and long term.
Clayton County,…
Public Aid Program For Schools Based On Constitutional Provision That Barred Aid For Religious Schools Violated the Establishment Clause When There Was Public Aid For Private Institutions
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, was clearly one of the most far reaching, controversial and consequential opinions of the 2019-20 United States Supreme Court term. The question before the United States Supreme Court in Espinoza, was whether the Free Exercise Clause precluded the Montana Supreme Court from applying Montana’s no-aid provision to bar religious…
Civil Rights And Local Government
Privacy is Inherent in a Driver’s Statutory Right to Counsel
- In Rosing v. Director of Revenue, the Missouri Supreme Court, held that the statutory right to attempt to contact an attorney included the right to speak to an attorney privately.
- ” To conclude otherwise, would create absurd results.”
- For full review of this
…
Liability of City Officials
Flash Bang Policy – Should Be Reviewed
- Flash bangs are explosive devices, which can kill a person, especially a child, if it lands directly on them.
- “Police call them diversionary devices we call them bombs.” Law enforcement policy
- Should check to see if innocent individuals are around before deploying the device; that the police have
…
Missouri Supreme Court Recognizes Sex Discrimination Claim Based On Sex Stereotyping And Failure To Accommodate Transgender Student Who Wanted To Use Boys Bathroom In School
Introduction
This last year was a breakout year, with respect to the Missouri sex discrimination laws. First, the Missouri Supreme Court, held under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), a plaintiff could state a sex discrimination claim based on sex stereotyping. Second, a plaintiff could state a claim against a school district for failure to…
Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Introduction
The Missouri Supreme Court, reminded opposing counsel that it is unethical for an attorney to contact our clients when they are in an adversarial role. Having a club in hand, to remind attorneys who are in an adversarial position that ex parte contacts can violate the rules of ethics will be helpful in stopping…
Sunshine Law – Knowing or Purposeful Violation
Local government officials, routinely process thousands of Sunshine Law requests without a hint of a problem. Occasionally, a request may lead to a dispute over whether or not the record is open or closed, which, for the most part, can routinely be resolved; however, on rare occasions these disputes literally escalate into high stakes, life…
Important Zoning Cases In 2018-2019
Introduction – This last year was a good year for zoning cases, providing insights into how communities might deal with certain problems such as the difficult problem of allowing flexibility in your zoning ordinance, while at the same time retaining some level of protection for citizens who are concerned about certain uses that can easily get…
How Does Missouri Law Compare To Minnesota Ban On Apparel Containing Messages Inside Voting Area that Was Declared Unconstitutional
In 2010, Advocates in Minnesota, planned to have supporters wear buttons to the polls printed with the words “Please I. D. Me,” a picture of an eye, and a telephone number and web address for Advocates. (Minnesota law does not require individuals to show identification to vote.) One of the Advocates also planned to wear…